Oscillator / VCO

Behringer System 100 112 Dual VCO Review: Classic Analog Sync on a Budget

Two faithful System 100M oscillators with strong and weak sync and three CV inputs each, for around €56: the module I started with and eventually outgrew.

Behringer System 100 112 Dual VCO module standing on a studio desk beside its retail box, patch cables in the foreground
The 112 beside its box: 16 HP of 1979 Roland design, rebuilt.

The 112 is Behringer’s reproduction of one of the founding modules of the Roland System 100M, the modular system Roland launched in 1979: two identical analogue oscillators in 16 HP, at a price (around €56) that barely covers the case space it occupies. It was the module I started my rack with, and this review is written from that history. It has since left my rack, and explaining why is not a criticism of it. I also filmed the unboxing and a first run of sounds, so you can hear the pair before reading on.

Two identical oscillators, and why that is the point

Each half of the panel is the same VCO: a waveform switch giving triangle, sawtooth and pulse, a manual pulse width control with its own PW MOD IN so the pulse can be narrowed by voltage while you shape it by hand, a RANGE switch stepping from 32′ down to 2′, and a PITCH knob that trims plus or minus one octave around the range setting. Pitch modulation arrives through summed control inputs at 1 V/octave: Behringer specifies three CV inputs per VCO, so an envelope and two LFOs can all push the pitch at once, with an input level control to keep the depth honest.

Sync is the lesson this module teaches best

Each VCO carries its own SYNC IN and SYNC OUT, and a WEAK/STRONG switch selects between the two behaviours: strong sync locks the follower hard to the driver for the classic aggressive bark, while weak sync pulls at the pitch without fully capturing it, which is where the sweeter, more string-like character lives. Having a sync output as well as an input means the pair can hand synchronisation onwards or lock to the rest of the rack. Ian Boddy, who played the original system, praised the 100M’s oscillator sync sound, and the same behaviour is what you get here.

What you give up

There is no sine wave: pulse, saw and triangle are the whole menu, and only the pulse can be width-modulated. The PITCH control spans a single octave either way, so bigger jumps ride the RANGE switch rather than a knob. The 46 mm depth rules out the slimmest skiffs, and the current draw, 90 mA on +12 V and 70 mA on -12 V, comes from the maker’s published specifications rather than our busboard meter, so check it against a power-tight case. Availability swings too: stock comes and goes, and at the time of writing Thomann expects the next batch in six to eight weeks.

Who it is still for

If you are starting a rack, this is the cheapest serious on-ramp into analog pitch: two well-behaved oscillators that respond exactly the way the textbooks say, for less than the cost of much of what surrounds them. If your rack already runs three or four oscillators with finer trim, deeper modulation and wave-shaping, the 112 has little left to teach you, which is precisely the position I ended up in.

Behringer describes the 112 as an authentic reproduction of the original System 100M circuitry, and the panel behaves the way that claim suggests: everything is a knob or a switch, and nothing is menued. Each VCO runs the same signal path.

  • Waveform is a three-position switch: triangle, sawtooth or pulse. Only the pulse responds to width control.
  • Pulse width is set by the manual control and shifted by voltage at PW MOD IN, which Behringer specifies at up to plus or minus 10 V with 4 per cent of width change per volt, so an envelope or LFO there animates the timbre while the knob sets the resting width.
  • Pitch comes from the RANGE switch (32', 16', 8', 4', 2') plus a one-octave trim knob, and from summed control inputs at 1 V/octave across a 10 V range, each with its own level attenuator.
  • Sync is per oscillator, with an input, an output and the WEAK/STRONG mode switch; the sync input triggers from 2.5 V peak-to-peak upwards.

The numbers behind the panel: outputs sit at 10 V peak-to-peak, the oscillators free-run from 10 Hz to 500 Hz and reach from 1 Hz to 30 kHz with external CV, and power arrives on a standard 10-pin Eurorack header, drawing 90 mA on +12 V and 70 mA on -12 V with nothing taken from +5 V. Physicals are 16 HP wide and 46 mm deep. All figures are the maker's published specifications.

Patch recipe

Sync Growl: Patch VCO 1 SYNC OUT into VCO 2 SYNC IN, set VCO 2's sync switch to STRONG, hold one note, and sweep VCO 2 PITCH for the hard-locked bark. Flip to WEAK for the pulling, string-like version of the same patch.

The Verdict

8/10

A faithful, no-frills pair of analog oscillators that sounds better than its price has any right to expect. It was my way into Eurorack, it taught me sync and pulse-width modulation, and it never put a foot wrong. I have outgrown it, but out of choice rather than complaint: my rack now asks more of an oscillator than two clean waveforms and a sync jack, and that is a compliment to where I started.

Pros

  • Two complete analog VCOs for around €56
  • Strong and weak sync on dedicated jacks, with a sync output for chaining
  • Pulse width modulated by hand and by CV at the same time

Cons

  • 46 mm depth rules out the slimmest skiffs
  • No sine wave, and pitch trim spans just one octave either side
  • 70 mA on -12 V is a heavy draw for two oscillators

Does it stay in my rack?

Out of the rack

Out of the rack, and it left without a fight. In the early days it was the pitch source for everything I patched: nothing wrong with it, no fault to point at, and a genuinely good sound. As I grew into Eurorack the rack started asking for things two straightforward VCOs do not do, and this was the module that came out to make the space. That is the honest arc of a first module: it did its job so well that I stopped needing it.

The Module That Started It

The 112 was my way into Eurorack. I bought it because it was cheap and it was an oscillator, and for the first months of my rack it was the pitch source for almost everything I patched. There is nothing wrong with it: it is solid, it sounds great, and it never gave me a moment of trouble. I outgrew it anyway, and it has since left the rack. That is the whole review in one sentence, and leaving it behind is not a criticism.

The sound is genuinely classic, and the history explains why. The 112 is Behringer's reproduction of module 112 of the Roland System 100M, the modular system Roland launched in 1979, and Roland built its analogue modular systems all the way to 1984. Ian Boddy, who played the original, called the System 100M an almost ideal introduction to the world of modular synthesis and singled out its oscillator sync sound, which is exactly the part of this reproduction I would single out too.

On provenance, this is deliberately not the Abacus conversation. The Abacus reproduces a design its maker is still building and selling, and I said what I thought about that. The System 100M went out of production in 1984 and Roland has never brought it back, so reproducing the 112 is closer to reissuing an unobtainable design than to diverting sales from a working company. Behringer announced this System 100 series in 2020, and whatever you think of the firm's habit of reproducing other people's classics, this one answers a demand the original maker chose to leave open.

It is also still the bargain it was. Thomann lists it at 56 euro and Andertons at 46 pounds, and at that price it is the module I would hand anyone starting a rack: two real analog oscillators, sync that teaches, and no menus anywhere. Mine is out of the rack because my rack changed, not because the module did. If I were starting over, it would be the first thing back in.

Where to buy

Behringer System 100 112 Dual VCO

€56 / £46

Buy the Behringer System 100 112 Dual VCO

We may earn a small affiliate commission at no extra cost to you.